Blog

80% Johnlock, 85% Sherlock, 15% misc

Hourly queue

Currently working on: a playlist straight from 1895

Reading


A Brief History of the French Revolution
The People's History of the French Revolution
After Virture

Watching


Friends
Brooklyn Nine-Nine
Notre Dame de Paris

Listening


String Quarter in F Major -- II. Assez vif by Maurice Ravel
listen here

Quote


A thing of beauty is a joy forever: Its loveliness increases; it will never pass into nothingness; but still will keep a bower quiet for us, and a sleep full of sweet dreams, and health, and quiet breathing.
Endymion, John Keats

johnthreecontinents:

shinka:

scenes that are technically useless in a narrative sense if the show is only and just only a crime show

  • the boyfriend/girlfriend discussion in asip
  • jim from it posing as gay and sherlock deducing his homosexuality in tgg
  • the whole scene in battersea station between john and irene
  • the ‘clean-shaven’ comment in teh
  • sherlock going to ogle some soldiers in tsot when we know bainbridge is still on duty and so sherlock doesn’t need to look out for him
  • janine and sherlock at the end of tsot when they’re dancing and janine ‘i wish you weren’t what you are’
  • the entire john/janine scene and john being jealous in hlv
  • again, janine/sherlock in the hospital, except for the newspapers and janine’s comment on ‘what kind of man sherlock is’, the scene doesn’t give us more details on the plot itself

i know i missed some of them but look at these: they don’t need to be in the show, they don’t give us hindsight on the plot but they are still there because they are all about sherlock and john, their relationship and their sexuality

Every given detail is important.

We have X minutes. If we give a detail, it better be important.

Oh, sure, we can set up a Red Herring or two, but we had better expect the viewer to attach importance to any detail we let loose in the plot. Shame on us, if we later expect the viewer to be surprised by the importance of the detail we let slip.

This is an Omnipresent Trope. It is rare for an author to devote a thirty page chapter of a book describing a character’s entire wardrobe of clothing unless said wardrobe provides great insight into a character or is being used as a metaphor for the human condition. A theater company is going to spend much more time working on the costumes of the lead characters than the costumes of those who only appear in a single scene- unless that single appearance needs to be emphasized as being extremely significant. In short, there is a fine line between good World Building, and rambling on about pointless crap- conservation of detail is all about filtering out irrelevant information to highlight the actual plot or interesting aspects of the setting.”

- The Law of Conservation of Detail

just sayin

  1. bitch-on-the-ditch reblogged this from weeesi
  2. pastamonster07 reblogged this from ofcowardiceandkings
  3. theregoesallthecottoncandy-blog reblogged this from stepfordgeek
  4. wmsscottholmes reblogged this from stepfordgeek
  5. ellipsisaspired reblogged this from stepfordgeek
  6. stepfordgeek reblogged this from enrichmentpumpkin
  7. someotherfandoms reblogged this from heimishtheidealhusband
  8. miyuzaki-1 reblogged this from heimishtheidealhusband
  9. decadentwallpaper reblogged this from heimishtheidealhusband
  10. heimishtheidealhusband reblogged this from monikakrasnorada
  11. cchrysaliism reblogged this from shinka
  12. ascendingaxis reblogged this from fervidasaflame
  13. holonora reblogged this from sophiehattcr
  14. deludedillusions reblogged this from ofcowardiceandkings
  15. ho-masse reblogged this from kinklock
  16. ekothepoet reblogged this from kinklock
  17. shinka posted this
TL